The desktop design has no mobile plan
Resolve the missing layouts, content order and touch behaviour before they become improvised fixes at the end.
Your approved design should survive the move into WordPress. I turn Figma layouts into responsive pages with carefully matched typography, spacing and interaction details, while giving your team sensible controls for everyday updates.
Discuss this serviceResolve the missing layouts, content order and touch behaviour before they become improvised fixes at the end.
Translate recurring patterns into reusable templates and global styles so changing a button or heading does not mean editing dozens of pages.
Review line lengths, alignment, image crops, form states and the rhythm between sections, not only colours and font names.
Inspect the Figma file, components, assets, fonts, interaction notes and available mobile designs. List missing decisions.
Choose Elementor or custom templates and identify which content and layout controls editors need.
Build shared styles and reusable sections, then connect navigation, forms and agreed dynamic content.
Review representative screens against the design, test real content and document approved responsive adaptations.
We agree what is included before I start. These are the usual things you receive, based on your project.
An approved service-site design translated into editable templates with shared typography and reusable enquiry sections. No client result is implied.
Talk about a similar ideaYes. I map the design to reusable Elementor structures and review any interactions or dynamic components that require custom code.
They are helpful. If only desktop screens exist, responsive interpretation is an explicit part of the scope and review process.
The goal is a faithful responsive implementation. Browser rendering, font metrics and changing content require sensible adaptations rather than one fixed screenshot at every width.
Yes. The editing controls and reusable templates are agreed during planning and covered in the handover.
Unique layouts, interactions, dynamic content, custom widgets and gaps in the design handover matter more than the raw frame count. Share a viewable Figma file for a scoped estimate.
This is a good fit when the visual direction is already established. You can bring a complete Figma file or a set of approved key screens. I identify missing states and responsive decisions before quoting so an attractive mockup can become a usable website.
A full brand identity or a new design exploration is a different scope. If those decisions are still open, we can define them before implementation begins.
Useful inputs include desktop and mobile layouts, font licences, original images, component variants and examples of intended interactions. Forms also need success, error and loading states. Where these are missing, we agree the behaviour rather than silently inventing it.
The editor should expose the content your team changes often while keeping structural rules understandable. Shared colours, typography and reusable sections help protect consistency. Custom widgets are considered when standard controls cannot represent the required component cleanly.
Animations are scoped around their purpose and tested with touch and reduced-motion preferences. Important copy remains accessible. Large assets, excessive effects and third-party widgets are considered alongside visual fidelity so the implementation is comfortable to use.
Share the approved Figma pages, responsive references and the content your team needs to edit in WordPress. Flag any missing mobile layouts or interaction states so we can resolve them before implementation. The handoff review separates reusable templates, editor controls and custom functionality.